'Good' and 'Bad' Websites
We will introduce you descriptions of good and bad websites on our topic and why we found them so.
________________________
【Good sites】
In order to make our blog reliable, we will use sources that we suppose give us accurate information. First for example, we will use oofficial papers published by Universities. They are often written based on information such as from academic books, that's why we judged them to be trustworthy. And of course, they have author names and references at the end.
The second, official News sites provided by News paper companies likely to be reliable. To increase reliability of the cotent, we will try to refer to national news papers more than local ones.
The third, we use a lot sites published by lawyers. If you are suspicious whether the lawyer really excist or not, you can search the name of him/her on this site. (https://www.nichibenren.or.jp/search.html 日本弁護士連合会, 弁護士検索)
All lawyers in Japan are registered on this site made by Japan Federation of Bar Association, and if lawyer's name doesn't come out after searching here, he/she doesn't exsist.
【Bad sites】
We sometimes use Social Media applications such as Twitter and facebook in order to serch opinions and feelings of people. Not all of them are reliable, because people write everything they want anonymously. We will read those posts carefully and consider whether they are appropriate to write on our blog.
In addition, we won't use internet forums to collect information. There may be correct information, though we thought it's better not to use it because most of them are anonymous posts that can not be easily verified.
____________________
If you are suspicious of the information we provide in our blog, please read our policy above. I hope it will convince you to some extent! Thank you.
published by Galina
Comments
Post a Comment